SoundCloud Backtracks on AI Terms of Use Updates
SoundCloud recently reversed its update regarding the AI-related terms of use, generating discussions among creators and AI enthusiasts. Initially, the proposed changes sparked concerns about the platform’s approach to AI-generated content. Now, SoundCloud is stepping back to reassess.
Initial Concerns
In early 2024, SoundCloud updated its Terms of Use, introducing language that suggested user-uploaded content could potentially be utilized to train artificial intelligence (AI) models. This change sparked significant concern among artists and creators, who feared that their music might be used without consent for AI training purposes, raising issues related to ownership, copyright, and the ethical use of AI technology on the platform.Pitchfork+2The Verge+2Pitchfork+2
In response to the backlash, SoundCloud‘s CEO, Eliah Seton, issued an open letter clarifying the company’s stance. He emphasized that SoundCloud does not and will not use user-uploaded content to train generative AI models without explicit consent. Seton stated, “AI should support artists, not replace them,” and assured users that any future AI applications involving their content would be strictly opt-in, ensuring transparency and artist control. Pitchfork+1Music Ally+1The Verge
Further clarifications from SoundCloud highlighted that the February 2024 Terms of Use update was intended to explain how AI is employed internally to enhance user experience—such as improving recommendations, search functionalities, playlisting, fraud prevention, and fan engagement—not for training generative AI models. The company has also implemented technical safeguards, including a “no AI” tag, to prevent unauthorized use of content and does not permit third-party scraping for AI training purposes. Pitchfork+2Pitchfork+2The Verge+2The Verge+1Pitchfork+1
Despite these assurances, some users remain skeptical, pointing to the initial lack of direct communication about the terms update and the potential for future changes. SoundCloud has reiterated its commitment to ethical AI development, artist control, and adherence to existing licensing agreements, aiming to maintain trust within its user community. The Verge
For more detailed information, you can review SoundCloud‘s current Terms of Use here: SoundCloud Terms of Use.
SoundCloud‘s Response
Acknowledging the community’s concerns, SoundCloud announced a reversal of the update. The company stated they are committed to fostering an environment where creators feel secure and supported. They plan to engage in further discussions with artists and industry experts to develop a more balanced and transparent policy regarding AI. This approach aims to protect creators’ rights while embracing the potential of AI in music production.
Future Implications
SoundCloud‘s decision highlights the ongoing challenges platforms face in navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of AI. As AI tools become more sophisticated and accessible, music platforms like SoundCloud must develop comprehensive policies that address issues such as copyright infringement, content ownership, and the ethical use of AI. The ultimate goal is to strike a balance that fosters innovation while protecting the rights and interests of creators.
